|
Why
It Matters
Not
all professional development is created equal. Research
indicates that high quality professional development is
essential for high quality teaching. Given the
complexity of teaching and learning in today's schools,
high quality professional development is necessary to ensure that all teachers are able to meet the needs of diverse student populations, effectively use data and become active agents in their own professional growth.
What We Know
The most
effective professional development focuses on the specific
content students will learn AND the specific difficulties
students encounter in learning the content.
Therefore, professional development need not focus on
generic teaching behaviors, but on the
analysis of curriculum and student responses to it.
David Cohen, one of the nation’s leading
researchers on teachers’ professional development,
advocates that PD should focus on building teachers' ability
to assess actual student work and investigate teaching and
learning. Offering
“in-service” for teachers on the new student standards
is insufficient to the task at hand. Teachers
need vehicles for analysis, criticism, and communication of
ideas and practices.
The National Staff Development Council issued standards for high quality professional development which state that professional development:
-
should organize adults into learning communities whose goals are aligned with those of the school and district;
-
requires skillful school and district leaders who guide continuous instructional improvement;
-
requires resources, including time, to support adult learning and collaboration;
-
should use disaggregated student data to determine adult learning priorities, monitor progress, and help sustain continuous improvement;
-
should use multiple sources of information to evaluate effectiveness; and
-
should prepare educators to understand and teach all students.
What’s
Happening
Professional development in North Carolina has received a significant amount of attention in recent years. At least six reports have analyzed and recommended reforms to North Carolina's professional development system to improve its efficiency and effectiveness.[1] Teachers added their voice to discussions of reform during negotiations in 2004 on the "calendar bill," when many claimed that the state's twenty (now fifteen) professional development days were not well utilized.
No Child Left Behind calls for sustained, intensive, and classroom-focused professional development that is scientifically based, yet there is still confusion around the issue and little consistency in implemention. A recent study by the Southeast Center for Teaching Quality — which included teacher surveys and school case studies in North Carolina — found professional development virtually non-existent or grossly inadequate in several low performing schools in under-resourced, rural areas. Teachers who need high quality professional development most seem to be receiving it the least. In turn, teachers in high performing schools have more control over professional development decisions, demonstrating the necessity of giving teachers a voice in those decisions affecting their own learning and growth as educators.
What the Toolkit
Provides
Above all, professional development
should provide educators the knowledge and skills to work
with all students. It should also enhance their capacity for
analyzing and interpreting data. The following
recommendations encourage a data-driven process in deciding
what professional development opportunities to provide,
implementing the system, and evaluating its impact on
student learning. In order to provide high quality professional
development to all teachers, stakeholders should consider:
Recommendation One:
Ensuring
professional development provides teachers with the
knowledge and skills necessary to work with all learners.
Recommendation
Two:
Providing
extensive resources, including time for PD design,
implementation and evaluation, and conducting an assessment of
current spending.
Recommendation
Three:
Providing
opportunities for teachers to assume responsibility for
their own PD through formal and informal means.
Recommendation
Four:
Developing
partnerships that provide expertise and resources to support
student success and teachers’ learning.
Recommendation Five:
Planning
PD that is aligned with school and district goals and
promotes evaluation and follow-up.
Recommendation Six:
Enhancing
capacity for analyzing and interpreting data to ensure PD
opportunities are based on the needs of students and
teachers.
[1]
Most recently, Center for Child and Family Policy at Duke University. Professional Development Initiative: Proposal for Action. Durham, NC: Duke University, November 2004.
|